The
publication of this edition of Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness is different than previous print runs of the novel
in that it is/was an artistic release – it’s illustrated. And it’s not just illustrated, its every-other-page is a full color illustration, a visual
rendering of the text on the facing page. All in all, artist Matt Kish’s treatment of the book is a fascinating,
and successful, endeavor.
At first
thought one might think the novel – a telling of an early-European exploration
of the Congo River – is an odd topic for illustration. Conrad’s book isn’t a travelogue, it’s an
intense psychological study of the mind of Marlow, the expedition leader, and
of the mindset of colonialism. Yet,
that is exactly why the illustrated-treatment of the story works. When Conrad’s
book was written in 1899, Africa was "the dark continent" – nothing but imagination. No one (a.k.a. Europeans)
knew what lay beyond the coastal areas of Africa. As a result of this lack of information, they
created fantasy nightmares of the interior. These “white-man fears” (some real, some not) lend themselves quite well
to illustration.
I picked up
this book because it relates to two of my recent reads: Into Africa by Martin Dugard, and a later
Conrad book, the Secret Agent, written in 1907.
Dugard’s
book is a telling of the Stanley & Livingstone story. In his epilogue, Dugard credits Heart of
Darkness as the “first” telling of that story, a claim that proved debatable when
I repeated it -- having now read it, I think I side with those who question
that claim. Yes, Livingstone once
explored the Congo, but that was before he got “lost.” And, while Livingstone studied the vast
cultural difference (vis-à-vis Europeans and Africans), he did so as an
explorer. In Conrad’s book, Kurtz (the
so-called Livingstone character) was an advance guard of exploiters, not
explorers; and Marlow (the Stanley counterpart) was a professional sailor, not
an international journalist.
Comparing
Heart of Darkness with The Secret Agent is another issue. These are two vastly different storylines,
yet both are told with Conrad’s exhaustive/exhausting writing style. The author is enamored with compound
sentences that often come across as run-ons, endless run-ons. Yet, when one is telling the story of a living nightmare,
a fast-paced endless run-on works.
Recommendation: Interesting from two standpoints, its
illustrated treatment of a classic; and as documentation on the western mindset
about Africa – in this case negative (contrasting sharply with the Tarzan
treatment a few years later).
Click on Amazon to purchase this book.
love the color aspect of the illustrations. Could this book be recommended for 'young adults' such as middle school?
ReplyDeleteNo, I think not. The text would be too difficult, not to mention too controversial in today's world (the dialogue, acceptable for its 1899 publication date, would not be tolerated in a school environment today).
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete