If ever one needed proof of the old adage “the book is always better" then Gone Girl is Exhibit-A, but more on that later.
A close friend of mine recommended I read Gone Girl by Gillian
Flynn. I picked the book up a few days
later, but then had a difficult time getting into it. The story begins with girl (Amy) meets boy
(Nick), they date, fall in love, get married, have a wonderful life in New York – yawn,
yawn, yawn. By page 75, I called my
friend and told her I doubted I’d finish the book. She insisted I continue. I did.
Being careful not to provide a spoiler, a brief summary of
Gone Girl is that after the marriage, things start to fall apart. Amy and Nick both lose their jobs. Her parents suffer a financial meltdown. His mother is diagnosed with cancer, and they
move to his hometown in Missouri to care for her.
The author, Gillian Flynn (a Chicagoan by-the-way), writes the
book as a chapter narrated by Amy, alternating with a chapter narrated by
Nick. The format works perfectly, hence
the “two sides to every story” tag line.
Movie Trailer
Movie Trailer
While the book works perfectly, the movie does not.
The problem with the movie isn’t with the actors. Rosamund Pike nails the Amy character. Lisa Banes who plays the minor role of Amy’s
mother is superb, as is another minor character, Nick’s lawyer, played by Tyler
Perry. The problem is with the character
Nick, the male lead. More accurately, the
problem is the movie’s director (David Fincher) totally left out an important aspect of
Nick’s character: the fact that Nick rapidly learns
to hold his own in this story. Ben
Affleck’s portrayal of Nick is okay, but it’s difficult to turn in an award
winning performance when the director doesn’t understand the storyline.
An additional problem is that the back and forth, and numerous diary flashbacks, that work so well in the book, are confusing in the movie.
In the director’s defense, there is a lot of material in Flynn’s book. Even with a movie
that is 2 hours and 29 minutes long, much of the story (both characters and
settings) had to be cut, making for some very difficult decisions. The biggest loss among the things cut or
downplayed was a more in-depth treatment of the Missouri town where the story
takes place. Fincher’s interpretation of
the town folk as rubes is shallow and just plain wrong.
And returning to that old adage: skip the movie, read the book.
No comments:
Post a Comment